Why does Trump want to make Panama and Greenland part of the United States?
In the lead-up to his inauguration, President-elect Donald Trump has quickly reasserted his presence in U.S. foreign policy.
(NPR) Recent comments about reclaiming the Panama Canal and even suggesting the annexation of Greenland and Canada have prompted reactions from global leaders. The foreign minister of Panama has firmly stated that control of the canal, relinquished by the U.S. over 25 years ago, is “not negotiable.”
Trump JR. recently traveled to Greenland, but hasn’t stated why he was there, but said that it was a leisurely trip. (Video below)
Experts agree that Trump is unlikely to resort to military intervention. At a recent news conference, he left open the possibility of using economic pressure to assert control over the Panama Canal and Greenland, claiming both are critical to U.S. security. However, some observers, like Dan Hamilton from the Brookings Institution, view these statements more as strategic and not genuine threats.
Hamilton said, in the context of Greenland and Panama, these aims involve countering potential adversaries like China and Russia, reflecting a modern interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine—a long-standing policy warning European powers against intervention in the Western Hemisphere.
Trump emphasized the need for Greenland to help national security, citing the presence of Chinese and Russian ships in close proximity. As the Arctic region experiences increasing temperatures and diminishing ice, experts believe Greenland’s geographical significance will grow, particularly for shipping routes.
Brent Sadler from the Heritage Foundation notes that the region’s strategic location is important to prevent a Chinese military foothold near the U.S.(NPR)
Moreover, maintaining and potentially expanding the U.S. military presence in Greenland and securing access to its valuable minerals are likely key objectives. The territory, which once served as a Cold War base, continues to draw interest from China, which is eager to exploit Greenland’s rich reserves of rare-earth minerals critical to technology. China is interested in Greenland for its natural recourses.
Concerns regarding Chinese influence also extend to Panama, where Chinese firms already manage key ports along the canal.
If acquiring Greenland or Panama means taking vital canal ports and recourses away from China and maintaining a stronger military stance, should Trump try to acquire Greenland or Panama. Would either Greenland or Panama negotiate or agree to any of this? We will have to wait and see.
ref;
https://www.npr.org/2025/01/11/nx-s1-5253910/donald-trump-greenland-panama-canal-canada
Leave a Reply